VTI + VXUS is the most commonly recommended two-fund global stock portfolio among DIY investors. Together, these two Vanguard ETFs cover virtually the entire global stock market — every publicly traded company in the US (VTI) and every major market outside the US (VXUS).

  • VTI — Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF — 3,600+ US stocks — 0.03% expense ratio
  • VXUS — Vanguard Total International Stock ETF — 7,000+ non-US stocks — 0.07% expense ratio

Quick Comparison: VTI vs. VXUS

Feature VTI VXUS
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.07%
Holdings ~3,600+ ~7,000+
Coverage Entire US stock market Entire non-US stock market
Countries USA 40+ countries
Dividend yield ~1.3%–1.7% ~2.8%–3.5%
10-year performance ~12–14%/yr ~5–7%/yr
Volatility Moderate Moderate-high
Inception date 2001 2011

What Is VXUS?

VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) tracks the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. This includes:

  • Developed markets (roughly 80% of VXUS): UK, Japan, France, Germany, Canada, Australia, Switzerland, and others
  • Emerging markets (roughly 20% of VXUS): China, India, Brazil, Taiwan, South Korea, and others

VXUS holds 7,000+ stocks — far more diversification than VTI’s 3,600, simply because there are more countries. However, many of these holdings are tiny positions.

VXUS top country weights (approximate 2026):

  • Japan: ~15–17%
  • UK: ~9–11%
  • China: ~8–12%
  • France: ~7–9%
  • Canada: ~6–8%
  • India: ~5–7%
  • Germany: ~5–7%

The Case for Holding VTI and VXUS Together

Why Diversify Internationally?

The primary argument for adding VXUS to a VTI portfolio:

  1. Valuation diversification: Non-US stocks often trade at lower P/E ratios than US stocks, potentially offering value
  2. Currency diversification: VXUS returns are partly denominated in non-USD currencies
  3. Sector diversification: International markets have higher weight in financials, energy, and materials; lower in tech
  4. Reduced home-country bias: 100% US investing ignores ~40% of global market cap

Why US-Only (VTI) Investors Disagree

Critics of international diversification argue:

  • US companies already derive significant revenue internationally (S&P 500 companies earn ~40% of revenue outside the US)
  • VXUS has substantially underperformed VTI over 2010–2025
  • Additional currency and political risk from VXUS
  • The simplicity of a single-fund portfolio

Historical context: The US outperformed international from 2010–2025. But from 1970–2000, international stocks outperformed the US in several decades. The future is uncertain.

What Allocation Between VTI and VXUS?

Global market-cap weight (the “neutral” position): The US represents approximately 60% of global market capitalisation (as of 2026). A market-weight portfolio: 60% VTI / 40% VXUS.

Common real-world allocations:

VTI % VXUS % Rationale
80% 20% US-focused with international hedge
70% 30% Moderate international diversification
60% 40% Approximate global market weight
50% 50% Equal weight (strong international conviction)

The Vanguard Target Retirement funds use roughly 40% international weighting in their equity allocation — a reasonable benchmark for moderate international exposure.

Performance: VTI vs. VXUS

The past decade strongly favoured US stocks:

Period VTI return VXUS return
5-year (2021–2025) ~14–16%/yr ~6–8%/yr
10-year (2016–2025) ~12–14%/yr ~5–7%/yr
Since VXUS inception (2011–2025) ~13–15%/yr ~5–8%/yr

VXUS has significantly underperformed VTI over 2011–2025. However, this is not evidence that VXUS will continue to underperform — it may reflect starting valuations and currency effects rather than a permanent structural advantage for US stocks.

Worked Example: Two-Fund Portfolio (70/30 VTI/VXUS)

$500/month invested over 20 years:

  • 70% VTI + 30% VXUS blended return (approximate): ~10–12%/yr
  • 100% VTI (approximate): ~12–14%/yr
  • 100% VXUS (approximate): ~5–7%/yr

The blended portfolio smooths returns between US and international markets. Whether this is better or worse depends on future performance — which neither fund can predict.

VWRL and VT: All-in-One Alternatives

For investors who want one fund covering global equities:

  • VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) — holds VTI + VXUS in one fund at 0.07% — the simplest global equity fund
  • VWRL — Vanguard FTSE All-World (not US-listed; available in UK/EU)

VT automatically rebalances between US and international at market-cap weight. It costs 0.07% vs. the VTI+VXUS blended cost of approximately 0.04–0.05%. The simplicity of one fund vs. slightly higher cost is the trade-off.

The Three-Fund Portfolio: Adding Bonds

Many investors add a bond fund to the VTI + VXUS base:

  • VTI (60%) — US equities
  • VXUS (25%) — International equities
  • BND (15%) — US Bond Market (0.03%)

This three-fund portfolio is a complete, globally diversified, low-cost investment portfolio. The bond allocation provides stability and reduces overall portfolio volatility.

Bottom Line

VTI and VXUS together provide the broadest possible equity diversification at low cost — the entire US and non-US global equity market for a blended 0.04–0.05% expense ratio. The right allocation depends on your views on US vs. international performance and your comfort with currency/geopolitical risk. Most financial educators recommend some international exposure; the debate is how much. A 70/30 or 60/40 VTI/VXUS split is a reasonable starting point for a globally diversified investor.

This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute personalised investment advice. All investments carry risk, including the possible loss of principal.

WealthVieu
Written by WealthVieu

WealthVieu researches and writes data-driven personal finance guides using primary sources including the IRS, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Federal Reserve, and Census Bureau.

The content on Wealthvieu is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, tax, or investment advice. Consult a qualified professional before making financial decisions. Full disclaimer · Editorial policy