The Invesco Nasdaq-100 ETF (ticker: QQQ) is one of the most popular and most traded ETFs in the world. It tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index — the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange. Over the 2010–2025 period, QQQ delivered extraordinary returns driven by mega-cap technology stocks. It comes with a 0.20% expense ratio and significant concentration risk.
What Is QQQ?
QQQ was launched in March 1999 and is managed by Invesco. It tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index, maintained by Nasdaq. The index includes the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange — but this isn’t limited to technology companies. Consumer, healthcare, and biotech companies also qualify.
That said, in practice, technology and communication services dominate:
Key QQQ facts (2026):
| Metric | Detail |
|---|---|
| Ticker | QQQ |
| Expense ratio | 0.20% |
| Cheaper alternative | QQQM (0.15%) — same index |
| Index tracked | Nasdaq-100 |
| Number of holdings | ~100 |
| Top sector | Technology (~55%+) |
| Dividend yield | ~0.6%–0.8% |
| AUM | ~$300B+ |
| Exchange | Nasdaq |
| Inception date | March 10, 1999 |
What Does QQQ Track?
The Nasdaq-100 Index includes the 100 largest non-financial Nasdaq-listed companies by market capitalisation. Inclusion criteria:
- Listed on the Nasdaq exchange for at least 2 years
- Has an average daily trading volume of at least 200,000 shares
- Is not in the financial sector (banks, insurance excluded)
- Index is cap-weighted
Because the Nasdaq disproportionately lists technology companies — and those companies have grown massively — the index has become a concentrated tech play.
Approximate QQQ sector breakdown:
| Sector | Approximate weight |
|---|---|
| Technology | 50–58% |
| Communication Services | 15–18% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12–15% |
| Healthcare | 5–8% |
| Industrials | 3–5% |
| Other | ~5% |
QQQ’s Top Holdings
QQQ’s top 10 holdings typically represent 50%+ of the entire fund. As of 2026, common top holdings include:
- Apple
- Microsoft
- Nvidia
- Amazon
- Meta Platforms (Facebook)
- Alphabet Class A (Google)
- Alphabet Class C
- Broadcom
- Tesla
- Costco
This extreme concentration means QQQ’s performance is heavily determined by a handful of mega-cap tech companies.
QQQ vs. VOO: The Cost and Risk Comparison
| Feature | QQQ | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | 0.03% |
| Holdings | ~100 | ~503 |
| Sector focus | Tech/growth heavy | All 11 sectors |
| 10-year return (approx.) | ~17–20% | ~12–14% |
| Volatility | Higher | Lower |
| Max drawdown (dot-com) | ~83% | ~50% |
| Recovery from 2000 peak | 2015 (15 years) | 2007 (then 2012) |
QQQ has outperformed VOO significantly over 2010–2025. But it has done so with higher risk. See VOO vs. QQQ for the full comparison.
QQQ Historical Performance
| Period | QQQ approximate return |
|---|---|
| 5-year (2021–2025) | ~18–22% |
| 10-year (2016–2025) | ~17–20% |
| 15-year (2011–2025) | ~19–22% |
| Since inception (1999–2025) | ~12–15% (includes dot-com crash) |
The since-inception return of ~12–15% despite losing 83% in 2000–2002 demonstrates the power of long-horizon compounding — but also shows how severe downturns can be for investors who don’t hold through them.
QQQ vs. QQQM: Which Should You Buy?
Most long-term investors should prefer QQQM over QQQ:
| Feature | QQQ | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | 0.15% |
| Same index | Yes | Yes |
| Liquidity | Extremely high | High |
| Options market | Deep | Growing |
| Best for | Traders/institutions | Buy-and-hold investors |
The 0.05% annual savings of QQQM vs. QQQ compound meaningfully over time:
- $100,000 invested for 30 years: QQQM saves ~$10,000–$15,000 vs. QQQ (assuming equal gross returns)
Exception: Active options traders and hedge funds need QQQ’s liquidity and options depth. For them, QQQ remains the instrument of choice.
QQQ Dividends
QQQ pays quarterly dividends from the dividends of its 100 underlying companies. The yield is low (~0.6%–0.8%) because:
- Technology companies typically prioritise share buybacks and reinvestment over dividends
- High-growth companies with low dividend yields dominate the portfolio
QQQ is not suitable for investors who rely on dividend income. It is designed for growth-oriented investors.
Worked Example: $300/Month in QQQ vs. VOO
Assuming historical approximations continue (QQQ ~17% gross, VOO ~13% gross) but these are illustrative only:
| Years | QQQ portfolio | VOO portfolio |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | ~$87,000 | ~$71,000 |
| 20 | ~$430,000 | ~$295,000 |
| 30 | ~$1,800,000 | ~$1,020,000 |
QQQ’s higher hypothetical return produces dramatic differences — but the volatility risk means these projections assume you stay invested through multiple 30–80% drawdowns without selling. In the real dot-com crash, many QQQ holders sold at the bottom and never recovered.
Who Should Buy QQQ?
- Investors with a very long time horizon (20+ years) who can endure severe drawdowns
- Those who believe technology will continue to dominate the economy
- Active options traders who need QQQ’s liquidity and options depth
- Investors holding QQQ as a satellite position (20–30%) alongside a core VTI or VOO holding
Who Should NOT Buy QQQ?
- Investors within 10 years of retirement who cannot withstand an 80% drawdown
- Income-focused investors (QQQ’s yield is too low)
- Anyone not comfortable with 55%+ technology concentration
- Cost-conscious investors who prefer 0.03% over 0.20% (choose VOO or VTI instead)
Where to Buy QQQ
QQQ is available commission-free at all major brokerages — Fidelity, Schwab, Vanguard, E*TRADE, Merrill Edge, and others. If you want the cheaper equivalent, search for QQQM at your brokerage.
Internal Links
- VOO vs. QQQ: full comparison
- VOO ETF 2026 review
- VTI ETF 2026 review
- VOO vs. VTI: which Vanguard ETF?
- Vanguard vs. Fidelity: which broker?
- Vanguard investing hub
Bottom Line
QQQ is a powerful but high-risk ETF. Its 20-year track record is extraordinary — driven by the rise of Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Nvidia, and Meta. But it carries extreme concentration (100 stocks, 55%+ tech) and a high expense ratio (0.20%). Long-term investors with high risk tolerance may use QQQ or the cheaper QQQM as a satellite position. Most individual investors are better served by the lower cost, broader diversification, and lower volatility of VOO or VTI as a core holding.
This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute personalised investment advice. All investments carry risk, including the possible loss of principal.
The content on Wealthvieu is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, tax, or investment advice. Consult a qualified professional before making financial decisions. Full disclaimer · Editorial policy