Charles Schwab and Fidelity are two of the largest and most respected retail brokers in the US — and they are genuinely close competitors. Both charge $0 commissions, offer IRAs, banking, and robo-advisors, and provide strong research. The main differences are in trading platforms (thinkorswim vs. Active Trader Pro), fund families (SCHD vs. FZROX), and banking features. Here is a complete comparison for 2026.

Schwab vs. Fidelity: Quick Comparison

Feature Schwab Fidelity
Stock/ETF commission $0 $0
Options commission $0.65/contract $0.65/contract
Account minimum $0 $0
Margin rate (starting) 8.575% 8.325%
Active trader platform thinkorswim (industry-leading) Active Trader Pro (desktop only)
Mobile active-trader app thinkorswim Mobile None (Active Trader Pro desktop only)
Futures trading Yes No
Fractional shares Yes ($5, S&P 500, up to 30 stocks) Yes ($1, S&P 500)
Own ETF family SCHD, SCHB, SCHG… (~0.03%) FZROX, FZILX (0.00%)
Robo-advisor Intelligent Portfolios ($0 fee, $5K min) Fidelity Go ($0, no minimum)
Banking Schwab Bank (no-fee checking, global ATM) CMA (no-fee, FDIC up to $5M)
529 plan Yes (Kansas) Yes (NH UNIQUE, MA U.Fund)

Fees and Margin Rates

Fee Schwab Fidelity
Online stock/ETF $0 $0
Options (per contract) $0.65 $0.65
Account fee $0 $0
Transfer out (ACAT) $0 $0
Margin rate (starting) 8.575% 8.325%

Fidelity’s margin rates start slightly lower than Schwab’s — a meaningful difference for active margin users. Both charge $0 ACAT transfer fees, making it easy to move assets if you ever switch.

Trading Platforms

Schwab: thinkorswim

The standout advantage. thinkorswim is widely regarded as the most powerful retail trading platform available:

  • 400+ technical indicators and charting tools
  • Real-time Level 2 quotes and time and sales
  • thinkScript — write custom scanners in a proprietary scripting language
  • Futures trading (24/5 access to /ES, /NQ, /CL, /GC, and more)
  • paperMoney simulated trading with live market data
  • Full thinkorswim Mobile app (futures, L2, multi-leg options)
  • Options with full Greeks, probability analysis, and strategy scanner

Fidelity: Active Trader Pro

Fidelity’s professional platform is strong but limited in key areas:

  • Real-time L2 data and streaming quotes on desktop
  • Advanced charting with 100+ indicators
  • Options analytics and strategy tools
  • No futures trading
  • Desktop only — Active Trader Pro has no mobile equivalent
  • No custom scripting equivalent to thinkScript

Winner: Schwab — thinkorswim is more powerful, available on mobile, and supports futures. For most non-active-trader investors, the platforms are equivalent.

Fund Families

Schwab ETFs

  • SCHB (US Broad Market, 0.03%) — ~$26B AUM
  • SCHD (US Dividend Equity, 0.06%) — ~$60B AUM, highly popular
  • SCHG (US Large-Cap Growth, 0.04%)
  • SCHF (International, 0.06%)
  • SCHZ (US Aggregate Bond, 0.03%)

Schwab ETFs are portable — you can transfer SCHB and SCHD in-kind to another broker without selling.

Fidelity Zero Funds + ETFs

  • FZROX (Zero Total Market, 0.00%) — lowest expense ratio of any fund
  • FZILX (Zero International, 0.00%)
  • FXAIX (Fidelity 500 Index, 0.015%)
  • FSKAX (Fidelity Total Market, 0.015%)

Important: FZROX and FZILX are mutual funds that can only be transferred as cash (not in-kind). If you ever move to another broker, you must sell them (potentially triggering taxes in a taxable account).

Winner: Tie — Fidelity wins on absolute cost (0.00%); Schwab wins on portability and the SCHD dividend fund specifically.

Robo-Advisors

Feature Schwab Intelligent Portfolios Fidelity Go
Annual advisory fee $0 $0
Minimum $5,000 $0
Cash allocation 6%–10% (required) Minimal
Tax-loss harvesting Yes ($50K+) No
SRI option No No

Fidelity Go wins for investors with less than $5,000 (no minimum vs. Schwab’s $5,000). Schwab wins for investors above $50,000 who want tax-loss harvesting. The cash drag in Schwab Intelligent Portfolios (6–10% in low-yield cash) is a real cost — on a $100,000 portfolio, 8% in cash at 2% APY when money markets yield 4.5% costs approximately $200/year in opportunity cost.

Banking

Schwab Bank

  • Free checking with no monthly fee
  • Worldwide ATM fee reimbursements (unlimited)
  • No foreign transaction fees on Schwab Visa Platinum debit card
  • FDIC insured to $250,000
  • Interest-earning checking (~0.45% APY)

Fidelity Cash Management Account

  • Free checking with no monthly fee
  • Nationwide ATM fee reimbursements
  • FDIC coverage up to $5 million through sweep network (significantly higher than Schwab)
  • Debit card for ATM access
  • Cash earns competitive money market rates through sweep

Winner: Tie — Schwab Bank is better for international travel (global ATM reimbursements, no foreign transaction fees). Fidelity CMA is better for investors who want higher FDIC coverage.

Who Should Choose Schwab?

  • Active traders who need thinkorswim (futures, thinkScript, L2 mobile)
  • Options traders who want the best retail analytical platform
  • International travelers who benefit from Schwab Bank’s global ATM reimbursements
  • Investors who want portable ETFs (SCHB, SCHD transfer in-kind to any broker)
  • Investors who use the SCHD dividend ETF specifically

Who Should Choose Fidelity?

  • Cost-obsessed investors who want the 0.00% FZROX/FZILX expense ratio
  • Investors starting out who want Fidelity Go with no minimum and no advisory fee
  • Investors who need the highest possible FDIC coverage (Fidelity CMA up to $5M)
  • Investors who want the lower margin rate (Fidelity’s 8.325% vs. Schwab’s 8.575%)
  • Non-active-traders who use the standard web/mobile platform equally well at either broker

Key Takeaways

  • Both charge $0 on stocks/ETFs with no account minimums; Fidelity has slightly lower margin rates
  • Schwab wins on trading platform (thinkorswim), futures, and thinkorswim Mobile
  • Fidelity wins on lowest expense ratios (FZROX 0.00%) and Fidelity Go robo-advisor ($0, no minimum)
  • SCHD is Schwab’s unique advantage — one of the best dividend ETFs available; FZROX is Fidelity’s unique cost advantage
  • For most buy-and-hold investors, both are excellent — the choice often comes down to which ecosystem you prefer

For the full Schwab platform overview, see our Schwab review. For E*TRADE comparison, see our Schwab vs. E*TRADE guide.

WealthVieu
Written by WealthVieu

WealthVieu researches and writes data-driven personal finance guides using primary sources including the IRS, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Federal Reserve, and Census Bureau.

The content on Wealthvieu is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, tax, or investment advice. Consult a qualified professional before making financial decisions. Full disclaimer · Editorial policy