The Two-Test Method
Test 1: Age-Based Milestones
Compare your current retirement savings to your salary using these benchmarks (Fidelity’s widely referenced framework):
| Age | Retirement Savings Target |
|---|---|
| 30 | 1× annual salary |
| 35 | 2× annual salary |
| 40 | 3× annual salary |
| 45 | 4× annual salary |
| 50 | 6× annual salary |
| 55 | 7× annual salary |
| 60 | 8× annual salary |
| 67 | 10× annual salary |
These assume you started saving early, maintain a 15% savings rate (including employer match), and retire around age 67.
Test 2: Income Needs Model
More precise: model what you actually need.
Step 1: Estimate your annual spending in retirement (many people use 70–80% of current income as a starting point).
Step 2: Get your projected Social Security benefit at ssa.gov.
Step 3: Subtract Social Security from annual spending — the difference is what your savings must fund.
Step 4: Multiply that gap by 25 (the 4% withdrawal rule).
Example:
- Estimated retirement spending: $75,000/year
- Expected Social Security: $28,000/year
- Gap to fund from savings: $47,000/year
- Savings target: $47,000 × 25 = $1,175,000
The 4% Rule
The 4% rule (from the Trinity Study by Bengen, 1994) says:
Withdraw 4% of your portfolio in year 1 of retirement, then adjust annually for inflation. A well-diversified portfolio has historically survived 30+ retirement years using this approach.
Reverse-engineering your target:
Savings needed = Annual income gap ÷ 0.04 = Annual income gap × 25
This is a widely used heuristic. It assumes a broadly diversified portfolio (equity and bonds), not cash savings.
What the Milestones Mean in Practice
If you are at or above the milestone: You are on the standard Fidelity trajectory and do not need to take emergency action. Maintain your savings rate.
If you are 20–30% below: You are behind but the gap is closeable. Increasing your savings rate by 2–3 percentage points now and capturing the full match will likely get you to the next milestone on schedule.
If you are more than 50% below: More significant adjustment is needed. Options: materially higher savings rate, later retirement target, reduced planned retirement spending, or some combination. This is worth a session with a fee-only financial planner to model.
The Math of Working More Years
One of the most powerful variables in retirement planning is retirement age — not just because it extends the savings window, but because it shortens the period the savings must fund.
Impact of retiring at 67 vs. 65 vs. 62:
| Retirement Age | Working Years Remaining (from 40) | Approximate Balance Impact | Drawdown Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62 | 22 | Baseline | ~25–30 years |
| 65 | 25 | ~20% more | ~20–25 years |
| 67 | 27 | ~35% more | ~18–22 years |
| 70 | 30 | ~55% more | ~15–20 years |
Working 5 more years produces roughly 35–55% more savings while simultaneously reducing the number of years the money must fund. It is the most powerful adjustment available in retirement planning.
The Role of Social Security
Visit ssa.gov/myaccount to see your projected benefit at various claiming ages. The difference between claiming at 62 vs. 70 is approximately 76% more monthly income, adjusted for inflation.
Rough monthly benefit comparison (for median earner):
- Claim at 62: ~$1,400/month
- Claim at 67 (full retirement age): ~$2,100/month
- Claim at 70: ~$2,600/month
For most people with reasonable health, delaying Social Security to 70 (or at least to full retirement age) significantly reduces the amount their savings must provide.
Related: Am I Saving Enough for Retirement? · Should I Max Out My 401(k) or Pay Off Debt? · How Much Should I Have Saved by 30?